-
Cardiologia (Rome, Italy) · Jan 1999
Comparative StudyThe ranking of Italy's publications in the biomedical field: an objective evaluation.
- G Sperti and C Ierardi.
- Istituto di Cardiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma. gisperti@tin.it
- Cardiologia. 1999 Jan 1;44(1):51-4.
AbstractTo evaluate the scientific output of Italy compared to other countries in clinical and basic research, the twelve top ranking journals according to the impact factor in each group were considered. A total impact factor score of one country was the sum of the impact factor of all articles attributed to a certain country in all journals. Italy ranked sixth in clinical research but only ninth in basic research. According to our analysis, the Italian scientific output in the biomedical field is comparable to that of other countries. Further financial analysis of the correlation between research funding and scientific output could allow a more productive allocation of resources.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.