• M Fassbender, G Rothenbacher, C Weschler, C A Müller, and U Pfister.
• Klinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe. ortho-trauma@klinikum-karlsruhe.de
• Z Orthop Unfall. 2008 May 1;146(3):318-24.

BackgroundA generally accepted recommendation for the optimum surgical treatment of unstable, dislocated fractures of the proximal humerus is not yet available. According to the general surgical trend to minimally invasive techniques, the object of this study was to conduct follow-up examinations of the technique of minimally invasive T-plating at the proximal humerus developed at our hospital and to compare the results with those of other osteosynthetic techniques, especially concerning the complications of the surgical approach and the clinical outcome.Patients And MethodBetween 1/2000 and 6/2003, 117 minimally invasive T-plating procedures were performed on 116 patients by sliding through a T-plate from a small proximal incision. After application of the exclusion criteria, a total of 100 operations on 99 patients were left. The follow-up examinations were based on the Constant score and the DASH score.ResultsAt an average value of 70 points (SD +/- 21), the results of the Constant-Murley score were only medium to satisfactory (min. 17/max. 100 points). At an average value of 32 points (SD +/- 23), the results of the DASH score also were only adequate (min. 0/max. 78 points). A correlation between age, sex or fracture classification and the score results could not be deduced.ConclusionThe expectations for this technique were not met. Minimally invasive T-plating could not be shown to be superior to other techniques.

31 keywords...

hide…