• Urs Pfefferkorn, Sanlav Lea, Jörg Moldenhauer, Ralph Peterli, Markus von Flüe, and Christoph Ackermann.
• Department of Surgery, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland. urs.pfefferkorn@gmail.com
• Ann. Surg. 2009 Apr 1;249(4):573-5.

ObjectiveTo assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis at urinary catheter removal reduces the rate of urinary tract infections.Summary Of Background DataUrinary tract infections are among the most common nosocomial infections. Antibiotic prophylaxis at urinary catheter removal is used as a measure to prevent them, albeit without supporting evidence.MethodsA prospective randomized study enrolled 239 patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery, who were randomized either for receiving 3 doses of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole at urinary catheter removal, or not. Urinary tract infections were diagnosed according to Center of Disease Control definitions. Urinary cultures were obtained before and 3 days after catheter removal. Subjective symptoms were assessed by an independent study-blind urologist.ResultsPatients who received antibiotic prophylaxis showed significantly fewer urinary tract infections (5/103, 4.9%) than those without prophylaxis (22/102, 21.6%), P < 0.001. The absolute risk reduction for the occurrence of a urinary tract infection was 16.7%; the relative risk reduction was 77.5%, and the number needed to treat was 6. Patients with antibiotic prophylaxis also had less significant bacteriuria 3 days after catheter removal (17/103, 16.5%) than those without (42/102, 41.2%), P < 0.001.ConclusionsAntibiotic prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on urinary catheter removal significantly reduces the rate of symptomatic urinary tract infections and bacteriuria in patients undergoing abdominal surgery with perioperative transurethral urinary catheters.

28 keywords...

hide…