• Roger J Smith, John D Santamaria, David A Reid, and Espedito E Faraone.
• Department of Critical Care Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. roger.smith@svhm.org.au.
• Crit Care Resusc. 2014 Jun 1;16(2):119-26.

ObjectivesTo compare the admission characteristics, discharge destination and mortality of patients reviewed by the rapid response team (RRT) for deterioration with those of other hospital patients; and to determine the association between RRT review for deterioration and mortality.Design, Setting And PatientsAcute admissions of adult patients to a tertiary hospital between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2011 were identified from administrative data. Data for each patient's first admission were merged with RRT data on the first RRT event of each admission, if any. RRT events involving cardiac arrest were classified as arrest events and all others as deterioration events.ResultsOf 43 385 patients in the cohort, 1117 (2.57%) had RRT review for deterioration and 91 (0.21%) for cardiac arrest. Deterioration events occurred a median of 3.23 days after admission. Advanced treatments were instituted in 38.59% of deterioration events, and a new not-for resuscitation order for 5.55%. Compared with those not reviewed by the RRT, patients in the deterioration group were older (median, 70 v 60 years, P < 0.001) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (median, 1 v 0, P < 0.001). They also more often died in hospital (18.80% v 1.42%, P < 0.001) or were discharged to another hospital (37.51% v 13.39%, P < 0.001) and more often died in the 90 days after admission (24.44% v 3.48%, P < 0.001). Their adjusted odds ratio of death in the 90 days after admission was 5.85 (95% CI, 4.97-6.89, P < 0.001).ConclusionPatients reviewed for deterioration were older and had greater comorbidity than patients the RRT was not called to review. RRT review for deterioration was an independent risk factor for mortality.

25 keywords...

hide…