• Tetsuro Ohba, Shigeto Ebata, Koji Fujita, Hironao Sato, and Hirotaka Haro.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Yamanashi, 1110, Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan. tooba@yamanashi.ac.jp.
• Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun 1; 25 (6): 1775-80.

PurposeThe goal of this study was to compare the accuracy and cranial facet joint violation rates between percutaneous pedicle screw placements using conventional fluoroscopy and intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation.MethodsWe reviewed 194 pedicle screw of 28 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive lumbar or thoracic spinal stabilization. The accuracy of screw placement was evaluated according to two criteria published by Neo et al. and Upendra et al. Facet joint violation was evaluated according to the classification described by Babu et al.ResultsUpon Neo grading, CFT group had 19.4 % (14/72) pedicle breach rate and CT-IGN group had a 5.7 % (7/122) pedicle breach rate (p < 0.005). The same sets of screws were also assessed using the outcome-based classification established by Upendra. There were no screw caused neurovascular injuries (type 3 = 0) in both groups. The results showed that 87.5 % (63/72) screws had acceptable placements (type I) and 12.5 % (9/72) had unacceptable placements (type II) in CFT group. In contrast, 94.3 % (115/122) screw had acceptable placements (type I) and only 5.7 % (7/122) had unacceptable placements (type II) in CT-IGN group. Additionally, CFT group had a significantly higher facet joint violation rate of 30.5 % (11/36) than CT-IGN group that had a 3.8 % (3/79) violation rate (p < 0.005).ConclusionThis study indicated the use of intraoperative CT imaging (O-arm) navigation in PPS placement have very beneficial implications for MIS.

33 keywords...

hide…