• Ji-cheng Zhang, Yu-feng Chu, Juan Zeng, Hong-sheng Ren, Mei Meng, Jin-jiao Jiang, and Chun-ting Wang.
• Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
• Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Mar 1;25(3):145-8.

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of continuous high-volume hemofiltration (CHVHF) in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).MethodsA prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. Sixty-five patients with severe ARDS admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) from June 2007 to June 2011 were divided into control group (n=28) and treatment group (n=37). Patients in treatment group were treated with CHVHF and other routine treatments. Patients in control group received routine treatments only. The oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) were compared between control group and treatment group before and 6, 24, 48, 72 hours after treatment. The duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), ICU stay time, percentage of weaning from MV, and 28-day survival rate were also compared.ResultsThe indexes of pulmonary function were improved after treatment in both groups. With prolonged time of treatment, PaO2/FiO2 was elevated, and EVLWI, PaCO2 were lowered, and the improvements were more marked in treatment group compared with control group (6-hour PaO2/FiO2: 92.6±7.2 mm Hg vs. 83.8±11.4 mm Hg, 24-hour EVLWI: 10.8±3.7 ml/kg vs. 12.6±4.5 ml/kg, 24-hour PaCO2: 47.2±8.5 mm Hg vs. 51.4±4.8 mm Hg, all P<0.05). HR and MAP were improved after the treatment in both groups, and there was no significant difference between groups. Compared with control group, the duration of MV and ICU stay were shortened in treatment group (duration of MV: 12±4 days vs. 19±6 days, ICU stay time: 21±4 days vs. 33±8 days, both P<0.05), and percentage of successful weaning from MV and 28-day survival rate were higher in treatment group (percentage of successful weaning from MV: 81.1% vs. 64.3%, 28-day survival rate: 86.5% vs. 71.4%, both P<0.05).ConclusionsCHVHF is an effective adjuvant treatment for severe ARDS. It can improve the lung function, shorten the duration of MV, improve the percentage of successful weaning from MV, and the survival rate, and it lowers the mortality, but it imparts no obvious influence to hemodynamics in patients.

15 keywords...

hide…