• Critical care medicine · Jul 2002

    Multicenter Study

    Internal and external validation of the NOSEP prediction score for nosocomial sepsis in neonates.

    • Ludo M Mahieu, Jozef J De Dooy, Veerle R Cossey, Linde L Goossens, Sabine L Vrancken, Ann Y Jespers, Christina T Vandeputte, and Aimé O De Muynck.
    • Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
    • Crit. Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;30(7):1459-66.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the performance of a scoring system (NOSEP) to predict nosocomial sepsis in neonates at the hospital where the score was developed (internal validation) and in an independent data set from other centers (external validation).DesignMultiple center prospective cohort study.SettingSix neonatal intensive care units from the Flanders in Belgium.PatientsWe analyzed two groups of patients: 62 episodes of presumed nosocomial sepsis in the internal validation cohort and 93 episodes of presumed nosocomial sepsis in a multiple center external validation cohort.InterventionsAssessment of the predictive power of the NOSEP score 24 hrs preceding sepsis workup and the patients' basic demographic characteristics and co-morbidity was performed. Diagnosis of nosocomial sepsis and the microbiology results were registered.Main ResultsThe NOSEP score's discriminative capability was very good in the internal validation (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.73 +/- 0.08 [sem]). The NOSEP score performed satisfactory in the external validation (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.66 +/- 0.06). The calibration capability in both validation sets as measured by goodness-of-fit tests (internal validation, p =.56; external validation, p =.48) was good. An improvement of the NOSEP score was obtained for the external centers by redefining the cut-off of the items of the NOSEP score (area under receiver operating characteristic curve for NOSEP-NEW-I = 0.71 +/- 0.05) or adding co-morbidity factors (area under receiver operating characteristic curve for NOSEP-NEW-II = 0.82 +/- 0.04), with good calibration performance (goodness-of-fit test, p >.50). Finally, the fit of the NOSEP score demonstrated no significant variation across subgroups of patients.ConclusionsThe predictive power of the original NOSEP score is very good in neonates at the original neonatal intensive care unit. In other neonatal intensive care units, its discriminatory performance is satisfactory but could be improved after modification of the variables in the model or adding additional variables. To use such a NOSEP score in other neonatal intensive care units, its accuracy has to be validated and adjusted if necessary.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?

    User can't be blank.

    Content can't be blank.

    Content is too short (minimum is 15 characters).

    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.