• M van Wijngaarden, J Kortbeek, R Lafreniere, R Cunningham, E Joughin, and R Yim.
• Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
• J Trauma. 1996 Jul 1;41(1):26-31.

ObjectiveProvincial air ambulance transports of injured patients were quality reviewed prospectively to determine utilization and appropriateness of care.MethodsAll trauma air ambulance transports over a 2-month span were reviewed prospectively. Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, probability of survival, prehospital time, distance of transport, procedures performed, and outcome were determined. Quality control questions were asked of the sending and receiving physicians.ResultsThe majority of air ambulance transports reviewed (N = 97) were indicated for mechanism and severity of injury. Economics and requirement for advanced medical care were indications in only 15%. Physicians tended to perform more advanced procedures, likely related to higher patient Injury Severity Score (23 vs. 15, p = NS). Four problems with air ambulance access were identified. The overtriage rate was 5%. Inappropriate patient care was documented in six (6%) cases; a physician was present for only one of these.ConclusionsA low overtriage rate was documented, raising concerns that the undertriage rate may be too high. Injured patients air transported without physician accompaniment more often received inappropriate care, suggesting that physician accompaniment is beneficial.

14 keywords...

hide…