• Daniel Faria de Campos Pinheiro, Belchor Fontes, John Kioshi Shimazaki, Celso de Oliveira Bernini, and Samir Rasslan.
• Advanced Program, FMUSP-SP-BR. dfcp88@hotmail.com
• Rev Col Bras Cir. 2011 Sep 1;38(5):299-303.

Objectiveto assess the value of computed tomography in the diagnosis of cervical spine and spinal cord injuries in victims of blunt trauma.Methodswe reviewed the charts of blunt trauma victims from January 2006 to December 2008. We analyzed the following data: epidemiology, mechanism of trauma, transportation of victims to the hospital, intra-hospital care, indication criteria for CT, diagnosis, treatment and evolution of the victims. The victims were divided into two groups: Group I - without cervical spine injury, Group II - with cervical spine injury.Resultswe gathered medical records from 3,101 victims. Computed tomography was performed in 1572 (51%) patients, with male predominance (79%) and mean age of 38.53 years in Group I and 37.60 years in Group II. The distribution of trauma mechanisms was similar in both groups. Lesions found included: 53 fractures, eight vertebral listeses and eight spinal cord injuries. Sequelae included: paraplegia in three cases, quadriplegia in eight and brain injury in five. There were seven deaths in Group II and 240 in Group I. The average length of hospital stay was 11 days for Group I and 26.2 days for Group II. CONCLUSION. A CT scan of the cervical spine in victims of blunt trauma was effective in identifying lesions of the cervical spine and spinal cord injuries. Thus, despite the cost of neck CT and the low incidence of lesions identified by it, its indication based on the usual criteria seems justified.

19 keywords...

hide…