• Emerg Med J · Sep 2014

    The diagnostic utility of d-dimer, and other clinical variables in pregnant and postpartum patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

    • Dinesh Krishnamoorthy.
    • Emergency Medicine, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, United Kingdom.
    • Emerg Med J. 2014 Sep 1;31(9):783-4.

    Objectives & BackgroundPulmonary Embolism (PE) in pregnancy remains one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality in the developed world. However, there is a paucity of high quality evidence resulting in a lack of consensus in managing this group of patients. The aim of the study was to address the diagnostic utility of D dimer for suspected PE in pregnant and postpartum patients, and to identify any clinical presentation variables that are predictors of PE in this group of patients.MethodsA retrospective case note review of 152 pregnant and postpartum patients who underwent diagnostic imaging (Ventilation/Perfusion (V/Q) or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA)) for suspected PE at a tertiary teaching hospital from 2007 to 2011 was conducted. The reference range for D-dimer was less than 0.5 mg/L as being normal. The following variables were also assessed in terms of their predictive capability for PE diagnosis in pregnancy; Heart Rate (HR), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Shock Index (SI), and A-a gradient.ResultsThe application of D-dimer testing for suspected PE in this study population had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 73%- 100%), specificity of 42% (95% CI, 31%-53%), and a likelihood negative ratio of 0. None of the clinical variables were significant predictors of PE according to regression analyses: d-dimer odds ratio (OR) 1.52 95% CI [0.95, 2.42], HR OR 1.02 95% CI [0.56, 1.85], MAP OR 1.54 95% CI [0.89, 2.66], SI OR 0.70 95% CI [0.33, 1.51] and A-a gradient OR 2.08 95% CI [0.93, 4.62].ConclusionAccording to our study, there is supportive evidence that a negative D-dimer result is useful as a means of ruling out PE in pregnant and post-partum patients. However, we need a larger prospective observational study to collaborate the findings.Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.