• Tobias Krettenauer, Fanli Jia, and Maureen Mosleh.
• Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3C5. tkrettenauer@wlu.ca
• J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Feb 1;108(2):358-70.

AbstractThis study investigated the impact of emotion expectancies on adolescents' moral decision making in hypothetical situations. The sample consisted of 160 participants from three different grade levels (mean age=15.79 years, SD=2.96). Participants were confronted with a set of scenarios that described various emotional outcomes of (im)moral actions and needed to decide what they would do if they were in the protagonist's shoes. Findings demonstrate that emotion expectancies differentially influenced adolescents' hypothetical decision making in antisocial versus prosocial behavioral contexts. Whereas negatively charged self-evaluative emotions over failing to act morally (e.g., guilt) were the strongest predictor for moral choice in antisocial behavioral contexts, positively charged self-evaluative emotions over acting morally (e.g., pride) most strongly predicted moral choice in prosocial contexts. Older adolescents paid greater attention to outcome-oriented emotions that make the decision to act morally less attractive (e.g., regret). Overall, the study suggests that emotion expectancies influence moral decision making in unique and meaningful ways.Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

24 keywords...

hide…