• George C Velmahos, Nikos Zacharias, Timothy A Emhoff, James M Feeney, James M Hurst, Bruce A Crookes, David T Harrington, Shea C Gregg, Sheldon Brotman, Peter A Burke, Kimberly A Davis, Rajan Gupta, Robert J Winchell, Steven Desjardins, Reginald Alouidor, Ronald I Gross, Michael S Rosenblatt, John T Schulz, and Yuchiao Chang.
• Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02030, USA. gvelmahos@partners.org
• Arch Surg. 2010 May 1;145(5):456-60.

ObjectiveTo determine the rate and predictors of failure of nonoperative management (NOM) in grade IV and V blunt splenic injuries (BSI).DesignRetrospective case series.SettingFourteen trauma centers in New England.PatientsA total of 388 adult patients with a grade IV or V BSI who were admitted between January 1, 2001, and August 31, 2008.Main Outcome MeasuresFailure of NOM (f-NOM).ResultsA total of 164 patients (42%) were operated on immediately. Of the remaining 224 who were offered a trial of NOM, the treatment failed in 85 patients (38%). At the end, 64% of patients required surgery. Multivariate analysis identified 2 independent predictors of f-NOM: grade V BSI and the presence of a brain injury. The likelihood of f-NOM was 32% if no predictor was present, 56% if 1 was present, and 100% if both were present. The mortality of patients for whom NOM failed was almost 7-fold higher than those with successful NOM (4.7% vs 0.7%; P = .07).ConclusionsNearly two-thirds of patients with grade IV or V BSI require surgery. A grade V BSI and brain injury predict failure of NOM. This data must be taken into account when generalizations are made about the overall high success rates of NOM, which do not represent severe BSI.

21 keywords...

hide…