• Int J Clin Pharm Th · Mar 1997

    Interobserver agreement: Cohen's kappa coefficient does not necessarily reflect the percentage of patients with congruent classifications.

    • V W Steinijans, E Diletti, B Bömches, C Greis, and P Solleder.
    • Department of Biometry, Byk Gulden Pharmaceuticals, Konstanz, Germany.
    • Int J Clin Pharm Th. 1997 Mar 1;35(3):93-5.

    AbstractA widely accepted approach to evaluate interrater reliability for categorical responses involves the rating of n subjects by at least 2 raters. Frequently, there are only 2 response categories, such as positive or negative diagnosis. The same approach is commonly used to assess the concordant classification by 2 diagnostic methods. Depending on whether one uses the percent agreement as such or corrected for that expected by chance, i.e. Cohen's kappa coefficient, one can get quite different values. This short communication demonstrates that Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement between 2 raters or 2 diagnostic methods based on binary (yes/no) responses does not parallel the percentage of patients with congruent classifications. Therefore, it may be of limited value in the assessment of increases in the interrater reliability due to an improved diagnostic method. The percentage of patients with congruent classifications is of easier clinical interpretation, however, does not account for the percent of agreement expected by chance. We, therefore, recommend to present both, the percentage of patients with congruent classifications, and Cohen's kappa coefficient with 95% confidence limits.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.