• J Ho and M Lindquist.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415, USA. ho911doc@qwest.net
• Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Apr 1;5(2):159-62.

ObjectiveTo determine whether the use of warning lights and siren saves a significant amount of time for ambulances responding to requests for emergency medical aid in a rural emergency medical services (EMS) setting.MethodsA prospective design was used to determine run times for ambulances responding to calls with lights and siren (code 3) and for a similarly equipped "chase" ambulance traveling to the same destination via the same route without lights and siren, while obeying all traffic laws (code 2) within a rural setting. Data were collected for run time intervals, distance traveled, visibility, road surface conditions, time of day, and day of the week. Descriptive statistics, a paired Student's t-test, and analysis of variance were used to test for significant differences between code 2 and code 3 operations, as well as the other variables listed above.ResultsSixty-seven runs were timed during a 21-month period. The average code 3 response interval was 8.51 minutes. The average code 2 response interval was 12.14 minutes. The 3.63 minutes saved on average represents significant time savings of 30.9% (p < 0.01). Shorter runs had higher time savings per mile than the longer runs. Run distance was the only variable that was statistically significant in affecting time saved during a code 3 response.ConclusionCode 3 operation by EMS personnel in a rural EMS setting saved significant time over code 2 operation when traveling to a call.

12 keywords...

hide…