• Presse Med · Sep 1987

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    [Preoperative skin preparation. A prospective study comparing a depilatory agent in shaving].

    • O Goëau-Brissonnière, S Coignard, A P Merào, G Haicault, M Sasako, and J C Patel.
    • Service de Chirurgie générale, digestive et vasculaire, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne.
    • Presse Med. 1987 Sep 26;16(31):1517-9.

    AbstractTwo types of pre-operative skin preparation were compared in a prospective randomized study conducted on 100 patients undergoing elective surgery: 51 patients were shaven (group I) and 49 were prepared with a depilatory agent. In all cases skin preparation was performed on the eve of the operation. Bacterial density, measured immediately before surgery by application of a contact agar preparation was 493 +/- 928 CFU in group I and 386 +/- 670 CFU in group II (NS). Bacterial density was less than 25 CFU in a significantly greater number of group II patients (P less than 0.01). On the second postoperative day, the number of scars without any sign of sepsis was significantly greater in group II patients (P less than 0.05). In addition, the depilatory agent proved bactericidal against 3 pathogenic strains (S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and E. coli). Depilation with a chemical agent seems to be a satisfactory method of pre-operative skin preparation. It is more rapid than shaving, it can be applied to areas not easily accessible to razors, and it can often be carried out by the patient himself.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…