• G C Wydro, D C Cone, and S J Davidson.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny University of the Health Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. wydro@allegheny.edu
• Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997 Oct 1; 1 (4): 233-7.

ObjectiveTo assess regulatory trends in EMS medical direction by examining state EMS legislation and regulations, and legal qualifications for medical direction.MethodsA two-page survey was mailed to all 50 state EMS directors, with a repeat mailing to nonresponders and telephone follow-up as needed. Copies of EMS legislation and regulations were requested to assist in the interpretation of answers to survey questions. The questions focused on two physician roles in the oversight of the practice of paramedics; off-line ALS service medical director (ASMD) and on-line medical command (OLMC).ResultsThirty-nine surveys were returned (78%). Only one state (IL) requires that ASMDs be board-certified in emergency medicine. Thirteen others (33%) permit physicians with primary care specialization or various ACLS/ATLS certifications to serve as ASMDs. Twenty-two states (56%) require only that the ASMD be a physician; three states (8%) have no requirements at all. Eight states (21%) have no requirements for personnel providing OLMC, and another 25 (64%) require only physician licensure. Six states (15%) require various ACLS/ATLS certifications. Several states do not differentiate between the two physician roles. Twenty-four states (62%) provide some type of Good Samaritan protection for medical direction, but in two of these only unpaid medical directors are protected.ConclusionsThere is tremendous variation in regulatory requirements for physician participation in EMS medical direction activities at the ALS level. Few states have specific training or background requirements for the provision of OLMC, and a requirement for board certification in emergency medicine is the exception, not the rule.

13 keywords...

hide…