• Matteo Barabino, Roberto Santambrogio, Andrea Pisani Ceretti, Rocco Scalzone, Marco Montorsi, and Enrico Opocher.
• 2rd Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Milan, San Paolo Hospital, Via di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy. matteo.barabino@alice.it
• Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan 1; 25 (1): 160-5.

PurposeThis study was designed to compare our laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) experience in the resectability evaluation of pancreatic or periampullary cancers (PAC) in two different periods: before and after the introduction of multidetector CT (MDCT).MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 104 CT-resectable patients with PAC. During Step 1 (1995-1999), we performed LUS on all patients, whereas during Step 2 (2002-2007), LUS was performed selectively according to Pisters' criteria.ResultsLUS was satisfactorily performed in all cases. At Step 1 accuracy of LUS in predicting pancreatic resectability was high (96%) but it was markedly lower in a subgroup of patients with close contact between tumor and portal vein (sensibility of 57%). At Step 2, selective LUS was performed on 9 of 64 patients (14%). LUS confirmed the MDCT finding of unresectability in 8 of 9 cases, and allowed curative resection in 1 case. Only 1 of 55 of the patients who did not undergo LUS would have benefited from the procedure. The yield of LUS decreased from 45% before to 1.8% after MDCT.ConclusionsIn resectable-MDCT patients, routine LUS is unjustified. However, in doubtful MDCT cases, LUS has yet a good yield. In the event of close vascular contact, neither MDCT nor LUS seem to be conclusive, and laparotomy is still the only solution.

31 keywords...

hide…