• Resuscitation · Mar 2015

    Inaccurate treatment decisions of automated external defibrillators used by emergency medical services personnel: Incidence, cause and impact on outcome.

    • Paul A Calle, Nicolas Mpotos, Simon P Calle, and Koenraad G Monsieurs.
    • Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Department of Emergency Medicine, Maria Middelares General Hospital, Kortrijksesteenweg 1026, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: paul.calle@ugent.be.
    • Resuscitation. 2015 Mar 1;88:68-74.

    BackgroundThe rhythm analysis algorithm (RAA) of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) may be deceived by many factors. In this observational study we assessed RAA accuracy in prehospital interventions. For every rhythm analysis judged to be inaccurate, we looked for causal factors and estimated the impact on outcome.MethodsIn 135 consecutive patients, two physicians reviewed 837 rhythm analyses independently. When they disagreed, a third physician made the final decision.ResultsAmong 148 shockable episodes, 23 (16%) were not recognized by the RAA due to external artifacts (n=7), fine ventricular fibrillation (VF; n=7), RAA error without external artifacts (n=4) or a combination of factors (n=5). In six cases the omitted/delayed shock was judged to be of clinical relevance: survival with some neurological deficit (n=4), death without regaining consciousness (n=1) and no restoration of spontaneous circulation (n=1). In 689 non-shockable episodes, the RAA decided "shockable" 25 times (4%). This wrongful decision was due to external artifacts (n=9), a concurrent shock of an internal cardioverter defibrillator (n=1), RAA error without external artifacts (n=13) or a combination of factors (n=2). Fifteen spurious shocks were delivered. As these non-shockable rhythms did not deteriorate after the shock, we assumed that no significant harm was done.ConclusionsUp to 16% of shockable rhythms were not detected and 4% of non-shockable rhythms were interpreted as shockable. Therefore, all AED interventions should be reviewed. Feedback to caregivers may avoid future deleterious interactions with the AED, whereas AED manufacturers may use this information to improve RAA accuracy. This approach may improve the outcome of some VF patients.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.