• Masui · Oct 2015

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    [Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block Compared with the Epidural Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery].

    • Yuta Kashiwagi, Takafumi Iida, Takayuki Kunisawa, and Hiroshi Iwasaki.
    • Masui. 2015 Oct 1; 64 (10): 1010-4.

    BackgroundThoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) has proven to be safer by using ultrasound imaging. This prospective randomized study was designed to investigate postoperative pain relief and intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing ultrasound-guided TPVB or epidural analgesia.MethodsTwelve patients scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer were randomly divided into two groups and received ultrasound guided TPVB (N=6) or epidural analgesia (N=6). Both groups received postoperative analgesia with continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine 6 ml · hr(-1) via paravertebral or epidural block. Postoperative numeric rating score (NRS) and the data of intraoperative hemodynamics were collected.ResultsIn comparison with the epidural group, the level of NRS was higher in the TPVB group at 12 hr (4.5±1.05 vs 2.7±0.82, P<0.01), and 24 hr (4.5±1.05 vs 2.7±0.82, P<0.01) after surgery. In the TPVB group, the intraoperative amount of transfusion was smaller (1,331±147 ml vs 1,693±162 ml, P<0.01) and the lowest systolic pressure was higher (87±4.56 mmHg vs 73±4.34 mmHg, P<0.01) than that of the epidural group.ConclusionsUltrasound guided TPVB was performed affecting hemodynamics less than the epidural anesthetic. There was less postoperative analgesic effect on TPBV than on epidural analgesia after thora- coscopic surgery when continuously infusing 0.2% ropivacaine 6 ml · hr(-1).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…