• Eric G Johnson, Alex Meier, Alicia Shirakbari, Kyle Weant, and Stephanie Baker Justice.
• Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky.
• J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul 1;49(1):43-9.

BackgroundRapid sequence intubation (RSI) involves a rapidly acting sedative plus a neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Rocuronium and succinylcholine are NMBAs commonly used in RSI with drastically different durations of action.ObjectivesEvaluate whether patients receiving RSI with a longer-acting NMBA had a greater delay in sedation or analgesia than patients that received a short-acting NMBA.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients presenting to the emergency department requiring endotracheal intubation. Exclusions included age < 18 years, pregnancy, prior intubation, and contraindication to sedation and analgesia. Primary endpoint was time to continuous sedation or analgesia after RSI in patients receiving rocuronium or succinylcholine. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), and impact of an emergency medicine pharmacist (EPh).ResultsA total 106 patients met inclusion criteria, 76 patients receiving rocuronium and 30 receiving succinylcholine. Mean time to sedation or analgesia was longer in the rocuronium group when compared to the succinylcholine group at 34 ± 36 min vs. 16 ± 21 min (p = 0.002). In the presence of an EPh, the mean time to sedation or analgesia was 20 ± 21 min, vs. 49 ± 45 min (p < 0.001). Time spent on ventilator, HLOS, and ICU LOS were not significantly different between groups.ConclusionsPatients receiving rocuronium in RSI had a significantly longer time to sedation or analgesia when compared to patients receiving succinylcholine. The presence of an EPh significantly decreased the time to administration of sedation or analgesia after RSI.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

28 keywords...

hide…