• Bmc Cancer · Jan 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers.

    • Michael Hoerger, Ronald M Epstein, Paul C Winters, Kevin Fiscella, Paul R Duberstein, Robert Gramling, Phyllis N Butow, Supriya G Mohile, Paul R Kaesberg, Wan Tang, Sandy Plumb, Adam Walczak, Anthony L Back, Daniel Tancredi, Alison Venuti, Camille Cipri, Gisela Escalera, Carol Ferro, Don Gaudion, Beth Hoh, Blair Leatherwood, Linda Lewis, Mark Robinson, Peter Sullivan, and Richard L Kravitz.
    • Rochester Healthcare Decision-Making Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. michael_hoerger@urmc.rochester.edu
    • Bmc Cancer. 2013 Jan 1; 13: 188.

    BackgroundCommunication about prognosis and treatment choices is essential for informed decision making in advanced cancer. This article describes an investigation designed to facilitate communication and decision making among oncologists, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers.Methods/DesignThe Values and Options in Cancer Care (VOICE) Study is a National Cancer Institute sponsored randomized controlled trial conducted in the Rochester/Buffalo, NY and Sacramento, CA regions. A total of 40 oncologists, approximately 400 patients with advanced cancer, and their family/friend caregivers (one per patient, when available) are expected to enroll in the study. Drawing upon ecological theory, the intervention uses a two-pronged approach: oncologists complete a multifaceted tailored educational intervention involving standardized patient instructors (SPIs), and patients and caregivers complete a coaching intervention to facilitate prioritizing and discussing questions and concerns. Follow-up data will be collected approximately quarterly for up to three years.DiscussionThe intervention is hypothesized to enhance patient-centered communication, quality of care, and patient outcomes. Analyses will examine the effects of the intervention on key elements of physician-patient-caregiver communication (primary outcomes), the physician-patient relationship, shared understanding of prognosis, patient well-being, and health service utilization (secondary outcomes).Trial RegistrationClinical Trials Identifier: NCT01485627.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.