• Christian Zauner, Alexandra Gendo, Ludwig Kramer, Georg C Funk, Edith Bauer, Peter Schenk, Klaus Ratheiser, and Christian Madl.
• Department of Internal Medicine IV, Intensive Care Unit, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Christian.Zauner@akh-wien.ac.at
• Crit. Care Med. 2002 May 1; 30 (5): 1136-9.

ObjectiveSensory evoked potential (SEP) peak latencies were recorded in order to evaluate the incidence and severity of septic encephalopathy, testing the hypothesis that the occurrence of septic encephalopathy is more frequent than generally assumed.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingMedical intensive care unit of a university hospital.PatientsSixty-eight critically ill patients were studied within 48 hrs after the development of severe sepsis (n = 41) or septic shock (n = 27).InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsSeptic encephalopathy was defined as prolongation of SEP peak latencies beyond the upper limit of the reference range of subcortical (N13-N20 interpeak latency) and cortical SEP pathways (N20-N70 interpeak latency), as well as asymmetry of peak latencies marked by the presence of subclinical cerebral focal signs. Subcortical SEP pathways were impaired in 34% and cortical SEP pathways in 84% of all patients. The prolongation of the cortical SEP pathway correlated with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score (r = 0.23; p <.0001). SEP peak latencies did not differ in patients with severe sepsis compared with those with septic shock. Subclinical cerebral focal signs were present in 24% of the subcortical SEP pathways and in 6% of the cortical SEP pathways.ConclusionsSeptic encephalopathy occurs more frequently than generally assumed, and its severity is associated with the severity of illness. The impairment of subcortical and cortical SEP pathways was not different between patients with severe sepsis and those with septic shock.

19 keywords...

hide…