• Ann. Thorac. Surg. · Jul 2011

    Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for resection of locally advanced thoracic tumors.

    • György Lang, Shahrokh Taghavi, Clemens Aigner, Ruben Charchian, Jose Ramon Matilla, Atsushi Sano, and Walter Klepetko.
    • Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. gyoergy.lang@meduniwien.ac.at
    • Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011 Jul 1; 92 (1): 264-70.

    BackgroundThe international experience with resection of advanced thoracic malignancies performed with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is limited. We examined our results to assess the risks and benefits of this approach.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all patients with thoracic malignancies who underwent tumor resection with ECMO support in our department between 2001 and 2010.ResultsNine patients (aged 21 to 71 years; mean, 54.8±7.5 years) underwent complex tracheobronchial resections (n=6) or resections of greater thoracic vessels (n=3) under venoarterial (VA) ECMO support. In 7 patients the underlying pathologic condition was non-small cell lung cancer, in 1 patient it was carcinoid tumor, and in 1 patient it was synovial sarcoma. The indication for extracorporeal support was complex tracheobronchial reconstruction (n=5), resection of the descending aorta (n=2), and resection of the inferior vena cava (n=1). ECMO cannulation was central (n=4), peripheral (n=4), or combined (n=1). Mean time on bypass was 110±19 minutes (range 40 to 135 minutes). A complete resection (R0) was achieved in 8 patients (89%). One patient died perioperatively as a result of hepatic necrosis. Eight patients were discharged from the hospital after 7 to 42 days (median, 10 days). Median time in the intensive care unit was 1 day (range, 0 to 36 days). The only complication related to the use of ECMO was a lymphatic fistula in the groin. Mean follow-up time was 38±42 months (range, 9 to 111 months). The actuarial 3-month survival was 88.9%, and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival was 76.7%.ConclusionsBased on this experience, we consider VA ECMO support to be a safe alternative to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for advanced general thoracic operations.Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.