• Zhongguo Gu Shang · Feb 2010

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    [Comparative study on impacted high tibial osteotomy and conventional high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of flexional medial knee osteoarthritis in aged patients].

    • Ming-tao Han, Fei Wang, Jin-ke Sun, and Zhen-hua Tang.
    • Institute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Shandong Wendeng Orthopaedic and Traumatic Hospital, Wendeng 264400, Shandong, China.
    • Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2010 Feb 1; 23 (2): 107-10.

    ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effect of impacted high tibial osteotomy and conventional high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of flexional medial osteoarthritis of knee joint in aged patients.MethodsFrom July 2003 to July 2006, 30 patients with flexional medial knee osteoarthritis were treated with impacted high tibial osteotomy or conventional high tibial osteotomy randomly. All patients,aged from 60 to 82 years,were suffered from 7 degrees to 19 degrees knee flexion deformities and 3 to 20 years medical histories. The bone healing periods, the recover of flexion and inversion deformities, and the recover of the knee joint function were observed postoperatively. The patients were followed up at 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 16 weeks, and 5, 7, 9 and 12 months postoperatively. The bone healing periods and the recover of flexional and inversion deformities were evaluated and compared. Twelve months postoperatively,the knee joint function were assessed with the Lysholm scoring criteria, and the therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was a significant difference in the average bone healing period between the impacted high tibial osteotomy group (9.26 +/- 2.23) weeks and the conventional high tibial osteotomy group (11.53 +/- 3.15) weeks. The knee joint function were evaluated according to the Lysholm clinical rating scales. One year postoperatively,the average Lysholm score were (88.5 +/- 4.4) points in the impacted high tibial osteotomy group,and the results showed excellent in 14 cases, good in 1. The average Lysholm score were (78.1 +/- 5.7) points in the conventional high tibial osteotomy group. The results showed 8 cases excellent, 5 good, 2 fair, accordingly. Postoperatively, the flexion deformities of the knee in the impacted high tibial osteotomy group were -1.1 degrees to 0 degrees and was corrected averagely (130 +/- 3.30) after surgery, and that in conventional high tibial osteotomy group (140 +/- 3.30) (the same as preoperation). The average postoperative femorotibial angle (FTA) were 170.2 degrees (ranged from 169.1 degrees to 172.3 degrees) and was corrected 12.3 degrees to 12.5 degrees after surgery in both groups.ConclusionCompared with conventional high tibial osteotomy, impacted high tibial osteotomy can significantly shorten the bone healing period, improve the knee flexion, varus deformity, and the knee function.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.