-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine 3 ml: comparison of plain and hyperbaric solutions administered to seated patients.
- R P Alston.
- University Department of Anaesthesia, Glasgow Royal Infirmary.
- Br J Anaesth. 1988 Oct 1; 61 (4): 385-9.
AbstractIn a double-blind study, 0.5% bupivacaine 3 ml in plain (n = 10) or hyperbaric (n = 10) solution was injected intrathecally to 20 patients who were in the sitting position, to produce spinal anaesthesia for transurethral resection of prostate. No statistically significant differences were found in time to maximum cephalad spread of analgesia nor in the level reached. However, the plain solution produced a smaller scatter around the mean level than the hyperbaric solution. The duration of analgesia was not significantly different between two groups. There was no difference in the incidence of complete motor block, but a longer duration of lesser degrees of motor block was found with the plain solution (P less than 0.05). The plain solution produced a more predictable level of blockade.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.