• Ann. Thorac. Surg. · Jan 2005

    Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study

    Is virtual bronchoscopy an efficient diagnostic tool for the thoracic surgeon?

    • Catherine M Jones and Thanos Athanasiou.
    • The National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
    • Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2005 Jan 1; 79 (1): 365-74.

    AbstractVirtual bronchoscopy has emerged over the past decade as a potentially complementary investigation to conventional bronchoscopy in the diagnosis, grading, and monitoring of pulmonary disease. A meta-analysis reporting on the use of virtual bronchoscopy has not yet been performed. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy compared to the gold standard investigation of conventional bronchoscopy (fiberoptic or rigid). Quantitative data synthesis included the calculation of independent sensitivity and specificity, construction of summary receiver operating characteristic curves, pooled analysis, and sensitivity analysis. Seventeen studies were identified comprising 459 patients. The calculated pooled sensitivity was 84% (95% CI, 78% to 89%), specificity 75% (95% CI, 62% to 85%) and area under the curve was 0.92, which shows good diagnostic performance. Meta-analysis confirms virtual bronchoscopy is very discriminating in the evaluation of patients with significant airway stenosis that is due to a wide spectrum of pathologic conditions. It can potentially have a beneficial role in selected thoracic patients (with bronchoesophageal fistulas, postlung transplantation, anastomoses, and suspected foreign body aspiration).

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…