• Critical care medicine · Jan 2001

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Gastric intramucosal PCO2 and pH variability in ventilated critically ill patients.

    • C C Huang, Y H Tsai, M C Lin, T C Tsao, and K H Hsu.
    • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
    • Crit. Care Med. 2001 Jan 1; 29 (1): 88-95.

    ObjectiveGastric intramucosal PCO2 (PiCO2) and pH (pHi) are currently used as indices of the adequacy of splanchnic perfusion and as end points to guide therapeutic intervention. However, little is known about their spontaneous variability over time. The present study was designed to define the magnitude of spontaneous variability of PiCO2 and pHi in sedated medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients using an automated recirculating air tonometer and to test whether high-level positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or inverse inspiratory/expiratory (I:E) ratio ventilation resulted in a greater variability than low PEEP with conventional I:E ratio ventilation.DesignProspective study.SettingMedical ICU in a tertiary medical center.PatientsTwenty-three acute respiratory failure patients.InterventionsAfter being sedated, patients were randomized to undergo pressure control ventilation at the following three settings: A, high PEEP (15 cm H2O) with conventional I:E ratio (1:2), and B, low PEEP (5 cm H2O) with inverse I:E ratio (2:1) alternately, and then C, low PEEP (5 cm H2O) with conventional I:E ratio (1:2). Each ventilation setting period lasted 1 hr.Measurements And Main ResultsThe PiCO2 and pHi were measured at baseline (time 0), and at 15, 30, 45, and 60 mins thereafter. The corresponding coefficients of variation (CVs) of PiCO2 for overall pooled group and settings A, B, and C were 4.0%, 4.4%, 3.4%, and 4.2%, respectively. The corresponding CVs of pHi for overall pooled group and settings A, B, and C were 0.36%, 0.37%, 0.33%, and 0.4%, respectively. Analysis of variance showed no significant difference in the CVs of PiCO2 or pHi between the three settings. The 95% confidence interval is approximately +/-8% variability for PiCO2 and +/-0.7% variability for pHi.ConclusionsIn critically ill medical ICU patients with stable hemodynamics, the spontaneous variability of PiCO2 or pHi are not substantial. High PEEP (15 cm H2O) and inverse ratio ventilation (2:1), which does not change the cardiac output or hemodynamics, does not contribute to increased spontaneous variability in PiCO2 or pHi.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,706,642 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.