• Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd · Dec 1998

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial

    [The Dutch 'Rand General Health Rating Index for Children': a questionnaire measuring the general health status of children].

    • M W Post, M M Kuyvenhoven, M J Verheij, R A de Melker, and A W Hoes.
    • Vakgroep Huisartsgeneeskunde, Universiteit Utrecht.
    • Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Dec 5; 142 (49): 2680-3.

    ObjectiveClinimetric evaluation of the Dutch version of the RAND general health rating index for children (child RAND), measuring the general health of children.DesignDescriptive.MethodThe child RAND, containing 7 questions, was administered to parents of 124 children with asthma and of an unselected control group of 224 children, all between 6 months and 12 years of age. The parents also answered a question about the existence of complaints about health. Measurements were repeated after 24 hours and after one month. We tested internal consistency, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity and sensitivity to change. Results were compared with those of the Functional status II (FS II).ResultsThe child RAND showed good reliability and validity. Cronbach's alpha was between 0.87 and 0.88 in the asthma group and between 0.71 and 0.80 in the control group. Test-retest reliability was 0.93 in the asthma group and 0.83 in the control group. Scores on the child RAND of children with asthma were significantly lower than those of children in the control group, and scores of children with health complaints were significantly lower than those of children without any health complaints in both groups. The sensitivity to change was lower than that of the FS II. The figures of the child RAND on the other measures of reliability and validity were comparable with those of the FS II.ConclusionThe Dutch child RAND is recommended as a generic measure of perceived health of children for medical research and may serve as a valuable addition to the measurement of functional health status by the FS II.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.