-
Critical care medicine · Jun 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPercutaneous dilational tracheostomy: a comparison of single- versus multiple-dilator techniques.
- J L Johnson, M L Cheatham, S G Sagraves, E F Block, and L D Nelson.
- Department of Surgical Education, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida, USA.
- Crit. Care Med. 2001 Jun 1; 29 (6): 1251-4.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and efficacy of single- vs. multiple-dilator techniques in the performance of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy.DesignProspective randomized trial.SettingIntensive care units at a level 1 trauma center.PatientsFifty consecutive patients requiring tracheostomy for airway control or prolonged mechanical ventilatory support.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive a percutaneous dilational tracheostomy by either the single- or multiple-dilator technique described by Ciaglia.Measurements And Main ResultsPercutaneous dilational tracheostomy was performed using the single-dilator technique in 6:01 +/- 3:03 mins and by the multiple-dilator technique in 10:01 +/- 4:26 mins (p <.0006). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the two techniques. No major complications occurred with either technique.ConclusionThe single-dilator percutaneous tracheostomy technique is a safe, cost-effective, and more rapidly performed method for bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.