• J Mal Vascul · Feb 2013

    Clinical Trial

    [Ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion of implantable venous devices: a review of 102 patients].

    • V Nguyen, J Jarry, P Farthouat, N Bourilhon, F Milou, and P Michel.
    • Service de chirurgie viscérale, hôpital d'instruction des armées Desgenettes, 108, boulevard Pinel, 69275 Lyon, France. vien9640@hotmail.com
    • J Mal Vascul. 2013 Feb 1; 38 (1): 6-12.

    AbstractTechniques of insertion of implantable venous devices have been widely described. The use of ultrasound guidance is part of the good practice recommendations of the SOR 2008 but there are few data in the literature and recommendations are based only on expert agreement. To this end we conducted a prospective, single-center study from January 2008 to August 2009 on percutaneous ultrasound-guided insertion of implantable devices. In addition to age, sex, the therapeutic indication and the site of implantation, we identified the operative time and number of venipunctures performed for each procedure. We then identified the infectious complications at three months and thromboembolic complications at 1 year and a half. Our study examined 102 consecutive patients. The mean age was 61.8 years (28-90); 71% of patients were men. For 101 patients, the internal jugular vein was punctured, the subclavian vein in one patient. In 86% of cases, the implantable venous device was inserted into the right vein. The average length of procedure was 30 minutes (18-60) for a single-vein puncture. Among the 102 patients, the overall morbidity was 7.8% with four infections (3.9%) and four thromboses (3.9%). There were no immediate perioperative complications (arterial puncture, hematoma, pneumothorax). In conclusion, percutaneous ultrasound-guided insertion of implantable venous devices in the internal jugular vein is a safe, minimally invasive technique which complies with the 2008 SOR recommendations by preventing the risk of venous thrombosis and avoiding repeated venous puncture. Less invasive than the open surgical approach, ultrasound-guided insertion is safer than puncture based solely on anatomical landmarks. In summary, this is a reliable, simple and easily reproducible technique which limits iatrogenic risks and improves patient comfort.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.