-
- Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo, Pierfrancesco Pugliese, Michail Sorotos, Corrado Rubino, and Guido Paolini.
- Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital of Rome, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
- Injury. 2015 Aug 1; 46 (8): 1656-63.
AbstractUp until recently severe foot defects have been underestimated and amputation considered the treatment of choice. Inadequate treatment of foot defects is generally responsible for impaired deambulation resulting in physical and psychological handicap to the patient and producing a negative impact on social life. Foot reconstruction represents a recent advancement but is still a great challenge to the plastic surgeon; indeed the absence of a comprehensive anatomical classification of foot defects makes sharing clinical experiences difficult, slowing down the progress in this field. We report a single surgeon experience on a consecutive series of 47 complex foot reconstructions performed on 45 patients with microvascular free flaps over a 27-year period. A retrospective review of the cases was performed, a detailed analysis of the defects is presented and possible solutions debated so as to outline the key points in the diagnosis and treatment of foot defects. In the decision making process, soft tissue defect location, dimension, and functional relevance have proven to be as important as the exact definition of the bone defect. A new anatomical classification scheme for composite defects of the foot, involving both bone and soft tissue, is proposed in order to allow for a correct evaluation of the wound and an easier identification of the ideal treatment. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.