-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cost-effectiveness of nurse-led disease management for heart failure in an ethnically diverse urban community.
- Paul L Hebert, Jane E Sisk, Jason J Wang, Leah Tuzzio, Jodi M Casabianca, Mark R Chassin, Carol Horowitz, and Mary Ann McLaughlin.
- Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health CareSystem, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1400, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
- Ann. Intern. Med. 2008 Oct 21; 149 (8): 540-8.
BackgroundRandomized, controlled trials have shown that nurse-led disease management for patients with heart failure can reduce hospitalizations. Less is known about the cost-effectiveness of these interventions.ObjectiveTo estimate the cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led disease management intervention over 12 months, implemented in a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial.DesignCost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside a randomized trial.Data SourcesMedical costs from administrative records, and self-reported quality of life and nonmedical costs from patient surveys.ParticipantsPatients with systolic dysfunction recruited from ambulatory clinics in Harlem, New York.Time Horizon12 months.PerspectiveSocietal and payer.Intervention12-month program that involved 1 face-to-face encounter with a nurse and regular telephone follow-up.Outcome MeasuresQuality of life as measured by the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 and EuroQol-5D and cost-effectiveness as measured by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).Results Of Base Case AnalysisCosts and quality of life were higher in the nurse-managed group than the usual care group. The ICERs over 12 months were $17,543 per EuroQol-5D-based quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and $15,169 per Health Utilities Index Mark 3-based QALY (in 2001 U.S. dollars).Results Of Sensitivity AnalysisFrom a payer perspective, the ICER ranged from $3673 to $4495 per QALY. Applying national prices in place of New York City prices yielded a societal ICER of $13,460 to $15,556 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves suggest that the intervention was most likely cost-effective for patients with less severe (New York Heart Association classes I to II) heart failure.LimitationThe trial was conducted in an ethnically diverse, inner-city neighborhood; thus, results may not be generalizable to other communities.ConclusionOver 12 months, the nurse-led disease management program was a reasonably cost-effective way to reduce the burden of heart failure in this community.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.