-
Minerva anestesiologica · Dec 2011
ReviewUse of synthetic colloids in sepsis: a critical review on efficacy, safety and patient benefits.
- R J Trof and A B J Groeneveld.
- Department of Intensive Care, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. r.trof@mst.nl
- Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Dec 1;77(12):1216-23.
AbstractIn this narrative review, the studies and analyses are discussed that pertain to benefits and detriments of synthetic colloids versus natural colloids or crystalloids used for fluid resuscitation in sepsis and septic shock. The relative amount of fluid infusions used to reach clinical or hemodynamic end-points are reviewed, as well as potential toxicity of starch solutions on the kidney. Hence, it cannot be excluded that adverse effects partly offset beneficial hemodynamic effects that are similar to that of natural colloids, so that in most analyses a mortality benefit of synthetic colloid fluid resuscitation in sepsis and septic shock cannot be demonstrated.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..