• Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Nov 1999

    Predictors of successful extubation in children.

    • R R Thiagarajan, S L Bratton, L D Martin, T V Brogan, and D Taylor.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Seattle, Washington, USA.
    • Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999 Nov 1; 160 (5 Pt 1): 1562-6.

    AbstractObjective criteria to predict extubation outcome in mechanically ventilated children are not available. Our goal was to study factors associated with extubation success and to evaluate the usefulness of the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) and the compliance, resistance, oxygenation, and pressure index (CROP index) in children. Data were prospectively collected on 227 mechanically ventilated children. Patients successfully extubated had significantly better lung compliance (Cdyn: 0.59 +/- 0.91 versus 0.39 +/- 0.14 ml/kg/cm H(2)O), higher Pa(O(2))/FI(O(2)) ratio (382.4 +/- 181.2 versus 279.8 +/- 93.9), and lower Pa(CO(2)) (41.3 +/- 6.7 versus 47.3 +/- 8.5 mm Hg). Spontaneous breathing parameters showed significantly lower respiratory rates (RR) (36.6 +/- 17.9 versus 52.8 +/- 23 breaths/min), larger tidal volumes (VT) (7.3 +/- 2.6 versus 4.9 +/- 1.8 ml/kg), and greater muscle strength (negative inspiratory force [NIF]: 41.8 +/- 15.4 versus 35.1 +/- 12.5 cm H(2)O) in successfully extubated children. Extubation failures had higher RSBIs and lower CROP index values. A RSBI value of /= 0.15 ml/kg/breaths/min had a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 53% for extubation success. Children failing extubation demonstrate abnormalities of respiratory function. The RSBI and CROP index are useful to predict pediatric extubation success.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.