• Pediatr Crit Care Me · Nov 2015

    Comparative Study Observational Study

    Location of the Central Venous Catheter Tip With Bedside Ultrasound in Young Children: Can We Eliminate the Need for Chest Radiography?

    • Paula Alonso-Quintela, Ignacio Oulego-Erroz, Silvia Rodriguez-Blanco, Manoel Muñiz-Fontan, Santiago Lapeña-López-de Armentia, and Antonio Rodriguez-Nuñez.
    • 1Pediatric Critical Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain. 2Biomedicine Institute of León (IBIOMED), University of León, León, Spain. 3Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Division, Clinical University Hospital, University of Santiago de Compostela, Institute of Investigation of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. 4Research Network on Maternal and Child Health and Development II (Red SAMID II), Spanish Health Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
    • Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2015 Nov 1; 16 (9): e340-5.

    ObjectiveTo compare the use of bedside ultrasound and chest radiography to verify central venous catheter tip positioning.DesignProspective observational study.SettingPICU of a university hospital.PatientsPatients aged 0-14 who required a central venous catheter.InterventionNone.Measurements And Main ResultsCentral venous catheter tip location was confirmed by ultrasound and chest radiography. Central venous catheters were classified as intra-atrial or extra-atrial according to their positions in relation to the cavoatrial junction. Central venous catheters located outside the vena cava were considered malpositioned. The distance between the catheter tip and the cavoatrial junction was measured. The time elapsed from image capture to interpretation was recorded. Fifty-one central venous catheters in 40 patients were analyzed. Chest radiography and ultrasound results agreed 94% of the time (κ coefficient, 0.638; p < 0.001) in determining intra-atrial and extra-atrial locations and 92% of the time in determining the diagnosis of central venous catheter malposition (κ coefficient, 0.670; p < 0.001). Chest radiography indicated a greater distance between the central venous catheter tip and the cavoatrial junction than measured by ultrasound, with a mean difference of 0.38 cm (95% CI, +0.27, +0.48 cm). Three central venous catheters were classified as extra-atrial by chest radiography but as intra-atrial by ultrasound. To locate the central venous catheter tip, ultrasound required less time than chest radiography (22.96 min [20.43 min] vs 2.23 min [1.06 min]; p < 0.001).ConclusionsBedside ultrasound showed a good agreement with chest radiography in detecting central venous catheter tip location and revealing incorrect positions. Ultrasound could be a preferable method for routine verification of central venous catheter tip and can contribute to increased patient safety.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…