• D R Jeffrey, P R Goddard, M P Callaway, and R Greenwood.
• Department of Clinical Radiology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK. danyajeffrey@ukgateway.net
• Clin Radiol. 2003 Jun 1; 58 (6): 478-81.

AimTo assess the ability of final year medical students to interpret conventional chest radiographs.Materials And MethodsTen conventional chest radiographs were selected from a teaching hospital radiology department library that were good radiological examples of common conditions. All were conditions that a medical student should be expected to recognize by the end of their training. One normal radiograph was included. The radiographs were shown to 52 final year medical students who were asked to describe their findings.ResultsThe median score achieved was 12.5 out of 20 (range 6-18). There was no difference between the median scores of male and female students (12.5 and 12.3, respectively, p=0.82) but male students were more likely to be certain of their answers than female students (median certainty scores 23.0 and 14.0, respectively). The overall degree of certainty was low. On no radiograph were more than 25% of students definite about their answer. Students had received little formal radiology teaching (2-42 h, median 21) and few expressed an interest in radiology as a career. Only two (3.8%) students thought they were good at interpreting chest radiographs, 17 (32.7%) thought they were bad or awful.ConclusionMedical students reaching the end of their training do not perform well at interpreting simple chest radiographs. They lack confidence and have received little formal radiological tuition. Perhaps as a result, few are interested in radiology as a career, which is a matter for concern in view of the current shortage of radiologists in the UK.

18 keywords...

hide…