• Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · Jan 2014

    [A MRI study of lumbar plexus in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis after extreme lateral interbody fusion].

    • Lei He, Jianwen Dong, Bin Liu, Ruiqiang Chen, Feng Feng, and Limin Rong.
    • Department of Spinal Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
    • Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jan 21; 94 (3): 178-81.

    ObjectiveTo analyze the magnetic resonance neural imaging distribution of lumbar plexus in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis and evaluate its value and the safety of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF).MethodsThree-dimensional fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (3D FIESTA) sequences of lumbar spine were scanned on 19 patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis, including levo scoliosis (n = 11) and dextro scoliosis (n = 8). All images were sent to workstation for multiplanar volume reconstruction to analyze the distribution of lumbar plexus from L1-2 to L4-5 level. The axial image distance (AID) was measured between anterior edge of lumbar plexus and sagittal central perpendicular line (SCPL). SCPL was drawn perpendicularly to the sagittal plane of intervertebral disc and passed through its central point. It was actually the pathway of guide wire implanting procedure and the ongoing axis of work channel during XLIF. With respect to SCPL, the distance with a positive value indicated posterior neural tissue whereas a negative value anterior neural tissue. The differences of AID were compared between convex and concave sides and among different cases and levels.ResultsFrom L1-2 to L4-5 level, the AID on the concave side in levo scoliosis or dextro scoliosis cases was (13.7 ± 2.5) mm/ (12.9 ± 5.5) mm, (8.3 ± 4.7) mm/ (8.5 ± 5.7) mm, (2.7 ± 3.6) mm/ (2.5 ± 7.2) mm and (-4.2 ± 3.8) mm/ (-3.8 ± 7.1) mm respectively. They were located significantly posteriorly to the relevant disc compared to those on the convex side at the same intervertebral space (P < 0.05). The differences of AID at the same side, concave or convex side, was significant (P < 0.05). No significant differences of lumbar plexus distribution existed between levo scoliosis and dextro scoliosis cases (P > 0.05).ConclusionLumbar plexus passes through psoas posteriorly to SCPL on both side at L1-2, L2-3 level and on the concave side at L3-4 level. And they shift anteriorly to SCPL on the convex side at L3-4 level and on both sides at L4-5 level. It indicates a ventral migration of lumbar plexus from L1-2 to L4-5 level. Preoperative magnetic resonance neural imaging is valuable for assessing the safety of XLIF approach. Operation from the concave may reduce the risk of injury to lumbar plexus.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.