• Erwin A Vogler.
• Departments of Materials Science and Engineering and Bioengineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. EAV3@PSU.EDU
• Biomaterials. 2011 Oct 1; 32 (28): 6670-5.

AbstractA minimum in the biological response to materials that is observed to occur within a narrow surface energy range is related to the properties of water at these biology-contacting surfaces. Wetting energetics are calculated using a published theory from which it is further estimated that water molecules bind to these special surfaces through a single hydrogen bond, leaving three other hydrogen bonds to interact with proximal water molecules. It is concluded that, at this Goldilocks Surface, the local chemical environment of surface-bound water is nearly identical to that experienced in bulk water; neither deprived of hydrogen bond opportunities, as it is in contact with a more hydrophobic surface, nor excessively hydrogen bonded to a more hydrophilic surface. A minimum in the biological response occurs because water vicinal (near) to the Goldilocks Surface is not chemically different than bulk water. A more precise definition of the relative terms hydrophobic and hydrophilic for use in biomaterials becomes evident from calculations: >1.3 kJ/mole-of-surface-sites is expended in wetting a hydrophilic surface whereas <1.3 kJ/mole-of-surface-sites is expended in wetting hydrophobic surfaces; hydrophilic surfaces wet with >1 hydrogen bond per water molecule whereas hydrophobic surfaces wet with <1 hydrogen bond per water molecule.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

8 keywords...

hide…