• The lancet oncology · Aug 2016

    Review

    International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma.

    • Shaji Kumar, Bruno Paiva, Kenneth C Anderson, Brian Durie, Ola Landgren, Philippe Moreau, Nikhil Munshi, Sagar Lonial, Joan Bladé, Maria-Victoria Mateos, Meletios Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, Mario Boccadoro, Robert Orlowski, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Andrew Spencer, Jian Hou, Wee Joo Chng, Saad Z Usmani, Elena Zamagni, Kazuyuki Shimizu, Sundar Jagannath, Hans E Johnsen, Evangelos Terpos, Anthony Reiman, Robert A Kyle, Pieter Sonneveld, Paul G Richardson, Philip McCarthy, Heinz Ludwig, Wenming Chen, Michele Cavo, Jean-Luc Harousseau, Suzanne Lentzsch, Jens Hillengass, Antonio Palumbo, Alberto Orfao, S Vincent Rajkumar, MiguelJesus SanJSClinica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigacion Medica Aplicada (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain., and Herve Avet-Loiseau.
    • Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: kumar.shaji@mayo.edu.
    • Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug 1; 17 (8): e328-e346.

    AbstractTreatment of multiple myeloma has substantially changed over the past decade with the introduction of several classes of new effective drugs that have greatly improved the rates and depth of response. Response criteria in multiple myeloma were developed to use serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins and bone marrow assessment (which is relatively insensitive). Given the high rates of complete response seen in patients with multiple myeloma with new treatment approaches, new response categories need to be defined that can identify responses that are deeper than those conventionally defined as complete response. Recent attempts have focused on the identification of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow using flow cytometry or gene sequencing. Furthermore, sensitive imaging techniques can be used to detect the presence of residual disease outside of the bone marrow. Combining these new methods, the International Myeloma Working Group has defined new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based absence of extramedullary disease, to allow uniform reporting within and outside clinical trials. In this Review, we clarify several aspects of disease response assessment, along with endpoints for clinical trials, and highlight future directions for disease response assessments.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…