• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Nov 2016

    Review Meta Analysis

    Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

    • Stephanie Weibel, Katharina Neubert, Yvonne Jelting, Winfried Meissner, Achim Wöckel, Norbert Roewer, and Peter Kranke.
    • aFrom the Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg (SW, KN, YJ, NR, PK), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena (WM) and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany (AW) *Stephanie Weibel and Katharina Neubert contributed equally to the writing of this article.
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Nov 1; 33 (11): 853-865.

    BackgroundThe frequency of caesarean section has increased dramatically in recent decades. Despite this, robust data regarding the consequences of caesarean section in terms of developing chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) are still lacking.ObjectiveThis systematic review analysed the incidence and severity of CPSP in women 3 to less than 6, 6 to less than 12, and at least 12 months after caesarean section.DesignSystematic review of prospective and retrospective observational studies and randomised controlled trials with meta-analysis.Data SourceWe searched MEDLINE to May 2015.Eligibility CriteriaWe included all studies investigating the incidence and/or severity of CPSP at least 3 months after caesarean section. The primary outcome was chronic postsurgical wound pain (CPSP 'wound'). Secondary outcomes were persistent pain in the back area, pelvic region or reported as residual pain, and severity of 'birth-related' chronic pain.ResultsMeta-analysis using the random-effects model based on 15 studies (n = 4475) reporting CPSP 'wound' at 3 to less than 6 months after caesarean section revealed an incidence of 15.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.9 to 20.9%]. For 6 to less than 12 and at least 12 months after caesarean section, the incidence of CPSP 'wound' was estimated at 11.5% (95% CI: 8.1 to 15.0%, n = 3345) and 11.2% (95% CI: 7.4 to 15.0%, n = 3451), respectively. Meta-regression analysis using the publication year as predictor revealed stable CPSP 'wound' incidences at each postoperative time slot from 2002 to the present. Of those patients who reported chronic pain, 9.6% (95% CI: 0.0 to 21.0%) had severe pain, 23.5% (95% CI: 10.0 to 37.0%) had moderate pain and 49.2% (95% CI: 18.9 to 79.4%) had mild pain at 6 months.LimitationsMajor limitations are high statistical heterogeneity of the meta-analyses and inconsistencies in reporting severity of chronic 'birth-related' pain.ConclusionThis meta-analysis finds a clinically relevant incidence of CPSP 'wound' after caesarean section ranging from 15% at 3 months to 11% at 12 months or longer that has been largely stable in recent years.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…