• Gábor Skaliczki, M Weszl, K Schandl, T Major, M Kovács, J Skaliczki, H Redl, M Szendrői, K Szigeti, D Máté, Cs Dobó-Nagy, and Zs Lacza.
• Department of Orthopedics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. skaliczki@gmail.com
• Acta Physiol Hung. 2012 Jun 1; 99 (2): 223-32.

PurposeThe clinical demand for bone grafting materials necessitated the development of animal models. Critical size defect model has been criticized recently, mainly for its inaccuracy. Our objective was to develop a dependable animal model that would provide compromised bone healing, and would allow the investigation of bone substitutes.MethodsIn the first group a critical size defect was created in the femur of adult male Wistar rats, and a non-critical defect in the remaining animals (Groups II, III and IV). The defect was left empty in group II, while in groups III and IV a spacer was interposed into the gap. Osteoblast activity was evaluated by NanoSPECT/CT imaging system. New bone formation and assessment of a union or non-union was observed by μCT and histology.ResultsThe interposition model proved to be highly reproducible and provided a bone defect with compromised bone healing. Significant bone regeneration processes were observed four weeks after removal of the spacer.ConclusionOur results have shown that when early bone healing is inhibited by the physical interposition of a spacer, the regeneration process is compromised for a further 4 weeks and results in a bone defect during the time-course of the study.

30 keywords...

hide…