• JACC Cardiovasc Imaging · Mar 2015

    Multicenter Study

    Prognostic value of LV deformation parameters using 2D and 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved LV ejection fraction.

    • Yasufumi Nagata, Masaaki Takeuchi, Victor Chien-Chia Wu, Masaki Izumo, Kengo Suzuki, Kimi Sato, Yoshihiro Seo, Yoshihiro J Akashi, Kazutaka Aonuma, and Yutaka Otsuji.
    • Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, Kitakyushu, Japan.
    • JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar 1; 8 (3): 235-45.

    ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to determine which strain component assessed by 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) and 3-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (3DSTE) was the most powerful predictor for future major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).BackgroundOngoing debate exists regarding the appropriateness of early surgery in asymptomatic severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Previous studies showed that 2-dimensional global longitudinal strain (2DGLS) was a significant predictor in asymptomatic severe AS patients. However, the prognostic utility of 3DSTE-derived multidirectional strain parameters has not been investigated in these patients.MethodsWe enrolled 104 asymptomatic severe AS patients (indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm(2)/m(2)) and preserved LVEF and performed strain analysis using both 2DSTE and 3DSTE. Two-dimensional and 3-dimensional global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain and global 3-dimensional strain were measured in each patient. All patients were followed to record MACE.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 373 days, MACE developed in 33 patients (32%). 2DGLS (-14.7 ± 3.3 vs. -16.3 ± 3.3, p = 0.0168), 3DGLS (-13.5 ± 2.5 vs. -16.1 ± 2.4, p < 0.0001) and 3-dimensional global radial strain (3DGRS) (35.9 ± 4.5 vs. 38.1 ± 4.4, p = 0.0209) were significantly impaired in patients with MACE compared with those without MACE. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed 2DGLS (cutoff: -17.0%), 3DGLS (cutoff: -14.5%), and 3DGRS (cutoff: 39.0%) provide a significant difference in MACE rate. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed that the area under the curve of 3DGLS for MACE (0.78) was significantly larger than that of 2DGLS (0.62, p = 0.0044) and 3DGRS (0.66, p = 0.0069). Separate multivariate analysis revealed 3DGLS was only significant as independent predictor for future MACE after correcting for mean pressure gradient and left ventricular mass index.Conclusions3DGLS is the most robust index for predicting future adverse cardiac events in asymptomatic severe AS patients with preserved LVEF.Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.