• Junjie Xiong, Peter Szatmary, Wei Huang, Daniel de la Iglesia-Garcia, Quentin M Nunes, Qing Xia, Weiming Hu, Robert Sutton, Xubao Liu, and Michael G Raraty.
• From the Department of Pancreatic Surgery (JJX, WMH, XBL); Department of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine (WH, QX), Sichuan Provincial Pancreatitis Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; NIHR Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit (PS, QMN, RS, MGR), Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK; and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (DI-G), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May 1; 95 (18): e3497.

AbstractEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are multimodal, evidence-based approaches to optimize patient outcome after surgery. However, the use of ERAS protocols to improve morbidity and recovery time without compromising safety following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains to be elucidated.We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of ERAS protocols compared with conventional perioperative care (CPC) in patients following PD.PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Science Citation Index Expanded and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library were searched between January 2000 and June 2015.The patients who underwent PD with ERAS protocols or CPC were eligible. The studies that compared postoperative length of hospital stay (PLOS), postoperative complications, or in-hospital costs in the 2 groups were included.A meta-analysis, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis were performed to estimate the postoperative outcomes between the 2 groups and identified the potential confounders. We used the methodological index for nonrandomized studies checklist to assess methodological qualities. Weighted mean differences (WMD) or odds ratios (OR) were calculated with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The publication bias tests were also performed through the funnel plots.In total, 14 nonrandomized comparative studies with 1409 ERAS cases and 1310 controls were analyzed. Implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly reduced PLOS (WMD: -4.17 days; 95%CI: -5.72 to -2.61), delayed gastric emptying (OR: 0.56; 95%CI: 0.44-0.71), overall morbidity (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.54-0.74), and in-hospital costs compared to CPC (all P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in other postoperative outcomes. Age, gender, and ERAS component implementation did not significantly contribute to heterogeneity for PLOS as shown by meta-regression analysis.Our study suggested that ERAS was as safe as CPC and improved recovery of patients undergoing PD, thus reducing in-hospital costs. General adoption of ERAS protocols during PD should be recommended.

32 keywords...

hide…