• Christian Loubert, Pierre-Olivier Gagnon, and Roshan Fernando.
• Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital affiliated to the University of Montreal, 5415 boul. L'Assomption, Montreal, (QC), H1T 2M4, Canada. Electronic address: loubertch@yahoo.fr.
• J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb 1; 36: 194-200.

Study ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to de termine the minimum effective fluid volume (MEFV) of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (HES) infused in a preload fashion which would prevent hypotension in 50% of parturients undergoing caesarean section. A secondary objective was to measure the hemodynamic effect of fluid loading on the subjects.DesignThis is a prospective, double-blinded, dose-finding study using an up-down sequential allocation design.SettingIn the operating room.PatientsThirty healthy parturients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anesthesia using a prophylactic phenylephrine infusion were included in this study.InterventionThe initial HES volume infused in the first patient was 500 mL. A failure of treatment to HES preload was defined as a single episode of systolic hypotension below 20% of baseline value. The next patient in the sequence was given a volume of HES adjusted by either an increment or a decrement of 100 mL according to the previous subject response to fluid preload.MeasurementsStroke volume and cardiac output were measured with a bioreactance-based non-invasive cardiac output monitor (NICOM).Main ResultsThe MEFV of HES was 733 mL (95% CI: 388-917 mL). Fluid loading before the administration of the spinal anesthesia resulted in an increase in stroke volume and cardiac output. The combined effect of spinal anesthesia and a phenylephrine infusion reduced the maternal heart rate and cardiac output, but not the stroke volume.ConclusionOur study is the first to investigate variable fluid loading volumes in this population. A HES preload of approximatively 700 mL prevented maternal hypotension in 50% of the parturients under the conditions of this study. We suggest that up-down sequential allocation design is a useful tool to compare different fluid loading regimens in this setting.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

33 keywords...

hide…