• Ann. Thorac. Surg. · Jul 2011

    Comparative Study

    The right internal thoracic artery: the forgotten conduit--5,766 patients and 991 angiograms.

    • James Tatoulis, Brian F Buxton, and John A Fuller.
    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. james.tatoulis@mh.org.au
    • Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011 Jul 1; 92 (1): 9-15; discussion 15-7.

    BackgroundThe right internal thoracic artery (RITA) is biologically identical to the left ITA, yet is rarely used in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). We examined the results and long-term patency of RITA grafts.MethodsBetween 1986 and 2008, 991 consecutive RITA graft angiograms for postoperative cardiac symptoms were evaluated by two independent observers. Grafts were considered nonpatent if they had a greater than 80% stenosis, string sign, or total occlusion. Patency was examined over time by coronary territory, whether in situ or free RITA, and compared with other conduits. Clinical results were collected prospectively and by the National Death Index.ResultsA total of 5,766 patients had a RITA graft as part of a bilateral ITA CABG procedure. Operative mortality was 1.1%; deep sternal infection 1.5%. Of 7,780 coronary conduits studied, 991 RITA conduits were examined; a mean of 100±60 months postoperatively (1 to 288 months). Overall ten-year RITA patency was 90%. The RITA graft patency to the left anterior descending artery (LAD; n=149) was 95% at 10 years and 90% at 15 years. Ten-year RITA patency to the circumflex marginal (Cx; n=436) was 91%, right coronary artery (n=199) was 84% (p<0.001), and posterior descending artery (n=207) was 86%. Ten-year RITA and LITA patencies to the LAD were identical (95% vs 96%) and to the Cx (91% vs 89%), respectively. In situ RITA (n=450) and free RITA (n=541) had similar ten-year patencies (89% vs 91%; p=0.44). The RITA patency was always better than the radial artery (p<0.01) and saphenous vein grafts (p<0.001). Atheromatous changes were not seen in the RITA angiograms. Ten-year survival of patients with RITA and LITA for triple-vessel coronary disease was 89%.ConclusionsLate patencies of RITA are excellent, equivalent to the LITA for identical territories, always better than radial arteries and saphenous vein grafts, and remain free of atheroma. Use of RITA in addition to LITA is associated with excellent survival in triple-vessel coronary disease. More extensive use of the RITA in CABG is recommended.Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.