• J Clin Anesth · Sep 2017

    Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study

    Is gabapentin effective and safe in open hysterectomy? A PRISMA compliant meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    • Xiao-Dan Li, Chao Han, and Wen-Li Yu.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, No.24 Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin City 300192, PR China.
    • J Clin Anesth. 2017 Sep 1; 41: 76-83.

    BackgroundPain management after open hysterectomy has been investigated for years. Owing to the effect of significant analgesic, gabapentin was often administrated for pre-emptive analgesia. However, the relationship between gabapentin and postoperative pain after open hysterectomy is still controversial. This meta-analysis was applied to assess the efficacy of pre-emptive use of gabapentin in open hysterectomy.MethodsThis meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare the use of gabapentin with placebo in open hysterectomy regarding (1) the mean difference (MD) of postoperative opioid requirements; (2) the changes of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in two groups; and (3) incidence rate of adverse effects. Systematic searches of all related literatures was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for open hysterectomy were included. The MD of postoperative opioid requirements and VAS scores, relative risk (RR) of incidence rate of adverse effects in the gabapentin group versus placebo group were extracted throughout the study.ResultsFourteen trials were included in this meta-analysis. The total opioid consumption at 24h was a less in gabapentin group. (MD=-11.61, 95% CI: -16.71 to -6.51, P=0.00) The visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 4, 12 and 24h were less in the gabapentin group. (MD=-16.83, 95% CI: -22.88 to -10.77, P=0.00), (MD=-17.45, 95% CI: -21.83 to -13.08, P=0.00), (MD=-9.83, 95% CI: -13.31 to -6.35, P=0.00) The incidence rate of vomiting and nausea were significantly less in gabapentin groups. (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.73, P=0.00), (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.93, P=0.02). Compared with placebo, gabapentin achieved higher patient satisfaction. (MD=20.43, 95% CI: 12.42 to 28.44, P<0.00).ConclusionThis meta-analysis suggested that the employment of gabapentin was efficacious in reduction of postoperative opioid consumption, VAS score and some side effects after open hysterectomy.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…