• Yusuke Tsutsumi, Shingo Fukuma, Asuka Tsuchiya, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Yosuke Yamamoto, Sayaka Shimizu, Miho Kimachi, and Shunichi Fukuhara.
• Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Department of Emergency Medicine, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, 280 Sakuranosato Ibaraki-machi Higashiibaraki-gun, Ibaraki 311-3117, Japan.
• Injury. 2018 Jan 1; 49 (1): 124-129.

IntroductionSpinal immobilization has been indicated for all blunt trauma patients suspected of having cervical spine injury. However, for traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) patients, rapid transportation without compromising potentially reversible causes is necessary. Our objective was to investigate the temporal trend of spinal immobilization for TCA patients and to examine the association between spinal immobilization and survival.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Japan Trauma Data Bank 2004-2015 registry data. Our study population consisted of adult blunt TCA patients encountered at the scene of a trauma. The primary outcome was the survival proportion at hospital discharge, and the secondary outcome was the proportion achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). We examined the association between spinal immobilization and these outcomes using a logistic regression model based on imputed data sets with the multiple imputation method to account for missing data.ResultsAmong 4313 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 3307 (76.7%) were immobilized. The proportion of patients that underwent spinal immobilization gradually decreased from 82.7% in 2004-2006 to 74.0% in 2013-2015. 1.0% of immobilized and 0.9% of non-immobilized patients had severe cervical spine injury. Spinal immobilization was significantly associated with lower survival at discharge (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.98) and ROSC by admission (OR, 0.48; 95%CI, 0.27 to 0.87). There was no significant sub-group difference of the association between spinal immobilization and survival at discharge by patients with or without cervical spine injury (p for interaction 0.73).ConclusionSpinal immobilization is widely used even for blunt TCA patients, even though it is associated with a lower rate of survival at discharge and ROSC by admission. According to these results, we suggest that spinal immobilization should not be routinely recommended for all blunt TCA patients.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

32 keywords...

hide…