• Manmeet Saluja and Peter Gilling.
• Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
• Int. J. Urol. 2017 Aug 1; 24 (8): 589-593.

AbstractVenous thromboembolism is potentially a lethal problem, and is associated with chronic morbidity. Venous thromboembolism is frequently diagnosed after urological surgery, yet the role of perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is not clearly defined. Any current recommendations are largely based on evidence derived from other surgical specialties. Even within different guidelines, there remains significant variation, suggesting a consensus is required. The present review aims to define the problem of venous thromboembolism within the urological population, and identifies patients at risk. It evaluates the role of various types of mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis, along with its timing and duration of administration in common urological operations. The current guidelines are summarized and compared in order to give the reader a better perspective of this vital condition.© 2017 The Japanese Urological Association.

21 keywords...

hide…