• Rakesh Sinha, Dharmadev Trivedi, Paul D Murphy, and Simon Fallis.
• 1 Department of Clinical Radiology, Warwick Hospital, South Warwickshire National Health Service Foundation Trust, Lakin Rd, Warwick, CV34 5BW, UK.
• AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Sep 1; 203 (3): W274-9.

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility and accuracy of small-bowel length measurement on MR enterography examinations compared with surgical in vivo measurements.Subjects And MethodsThirty-one consecutive patients who were undergoing elective laparotomy for Crohn disease were included in the study. These patients underwent a prior MR enterography examination, and true fast imaging with steady-state precession MR enterography images from the examinations were used to measure small-intestinal length. The MR enterography measurement was compared with a surgical measurement to assess accuracy and correlation.ResultsMR enterography measurements had a significant positive correlation with surgical measurements (r(2) = 0.98; p < 0.001) irrespective of bowel length. The average (± SD) percentage difference between MR enterography and surgical intestinal length measurement was 4.59% ± 0.44%. An average time of 36.5 ± 2.8 minutes was required for bowel length measurement on MR enterography. A significantly longer time was required for measurement of bowel length greater than 300 cm versus shorter bowel length.ConclusionSmall-bowel length measurements on MR enterography are accurate compared with anatomic measurements. MR enterography can provide an effective noninvasive investigation in planning surgical and nutritional intervention in patients with compromised bowel length.

21 keywords...

hide…