• Timothy Fung, Yahya I Asiri, Kamyar Taheri, Richard Wall, Schwarz Stephan K W SKW Hugill Anesthesia Research Centre, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Briti, Ernest Puil, and Bernard A MacLeod.
• Hugill Anesthesia Research Centre, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
• Eur J Pain. 2019 Feb 1; 23 (2): 260-271.

BackgroundNeuraxial opioids are widely used for intraoperative and post-operative analgesia. The risk of severe adverse effects including respiratory depression accompanies this analgesia, prompting the need for effective non-opioid alternatives. Systemic 1-amino-1-cyclobutanecarboxylic acid showed promise in preliminary studies to produce antinociception without observable toxicity. However, the effects of 1-amino-1-cyclobutanecarboxylic acid after intrathecal administration are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether intrathecal administration of 1-amino-1-cyclobutanecarboxylic acid produces antinociceptive effects in murine models and to elucidate its site and receptor mechanism of action.MethodsFemale CD-1 mice were randomized to receive intrathecal, intraperitoneal and intraplantar injections of 1-amino-1-cyclobutanecarboxylic acid. Animals receiving intrathecal injections were anaesthetized and injected between L5 and L6. Animals then received an intraplantar injection of 10% hypertonic saline into the right hindpaw and were video-recorded for 30 min. Videos were analyzed by a blinded observer who determined the duration that animals exhibited nocifensive responses.ResultsIntrathecal or intraperitoneal administration of 1-amino-1-cyclobutanecarboxylic acid reduced the time that animals exhibited nocifensive behaviour, whereas intraplantar administration produced no effect. The effects of intrathecal 1-amino-1-cyclobutanecarboxylic acid were restricted in dermatomal distribution, reversible and produced little or no depression of respiratory rate. An NMDA antagonist blocked antinociception, while mu-opioid or GABAB antagonists did not prevent ACBC antinociception.ConclusionsIntrathecal 1-amino-1-cyclobutanecarboxylic acid in mice produces robust, brief antinociceptive effects with a dermatomal distribution corresponding to the lumbar site of administration. This amino acid merits further exploration as a non-opioid neuraxial analgesic with little or no respiratory side effects.SignificanceThe novel, non-opioid analgesic, 1-amino-1-cyclobutanecarboxylic acid, produced robust, reversible and localized antinociception in murine models of pain. This study provides evidence supporting further investigation and development of 1-amino-1-cyclobutanecarboxylic acid as a non-opioid spinal analgesic.© 2018 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.

18 keywords...

hide…